Skip to content

  • Home
  • Top News
  • World
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Tech
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Contact Form

Nomadland shows American delusion in all its cruelty – Goop

Nomadland shows American delusion in all its cruelty – Goop

Michael McCann, April 5, 2024
•

01-05-2021

•

Reading time 4 minutes

•

649 Views

•

franciscozw
nomadland

Are they really modern nomads, fighters escaping the constraints of property, or are they merely victims of an antisocial system?

Nomadland, which this week won Oscars for best picture, best director (Chloé Zhao) and best actress (Frances McDormand), is a special experience, in part because you feel like you're watching a documentary the entire time. This is true to an extent because many of the roles in the film are played by people who more or less play themselves. Itinerants, nomads, itinerants, whatever you want to call them, people who live in a camper van or less and are constantly moving around the country in search of work, freedom and fulfillment. Outside of the movie, some players live this way in real life. They talk about it as if it is liberation, but in practice life turns out to be difficult and difficult.

The film begins with a village built around a factory where every resident worked. When the factory closed, the village disappeared as well. Within a few months, even the zip code no longer existed. We see a former resident. She lives in a truck she converted into a camper van and works as a temporary worker at an Amazon distribution center. Packing boxes. When Christmas ends and with it the shopping rush, she is made redundant and moves on to the next job with her own cart, if she can find one. This feeling of insecurity permeates the film. All the time you have no idea what the next step will be, what will happen. It looks almost as tired as it does in real life and I mean that as a compliment to the movie.

While watching, I also thought about Sorry, We Missed You, directed by Ken Loach, which is about the lives of self-employed people who work in deliveries and in the healthcare field. They have hardly any money, almost no future, and a lot of worries. This existence is presented to them as “freedom.” The difference is that the British film offers a clear indictment and exposes the perversion of the system, while Nomadland registers more and maintains the illusion that living this way is also a choice. The leading actress is offered the chance to escape her presence but does not do so. The alternative, stability, appears to be even worse. She is alone and proud of it. During a group hike at a natural monument, she isolates herself from the guide and others. She immediately gets lost and for a moment it seems like things are going wrong, but that doesn't seem to bother her. Maybe because she is grieving the loss of her husband and the life she dreams of. In this sense too, she clings to the illusion, just like her fellow sufferers. Nostalgia is the longing for a future made up of the past.

At the beginning of this century, I traveled across the western United States and was struck by the widespread poverty rarely seen through films and media. I was also surprised how this is considered normal in the US. Anyone who does not engage in the perpetual search for wealth and possessions does not belong. At the same time, people are very kind to each other, and the desire to help each other is enormous. The film shows that warmth well, but it does not hide the fact that social ties are also very weak, or as we say in Europe: superficial. This makes life difficult as everyone eventually has to be hard on each other. They are individuals living together without becoming a community. The other person is experienced primarily as a burden. They are supposed to value their freedom, but in reality it seems to prevent them from entering into commitments to each other. They are limited in their sense of freedom. Somewhere in the film they compare themselves to the pioneers, representatives of the great American illusion. The realization that the pioneers were land grabbers and exterminated indigenous people seems to have not yet dawned on even the most well-intentioned. It's as if you hear Balkenende talking proudly about VOCs, without realizing what he's saying.

McDormand's acting is so strong that you never doubt for a moment that she's walking around letting you as the viewer get to know her, even though that would be the last thing her character would want. So you are immersed in a world that you never want to be in, but which always arouses curiosity. Are they really modern nomads, fighters escaping the constraints of property, or are they merely victims of an antisocial system? The story, based on a non-fiction book, leaves the answer up to you.

Nomadland is one of those movies that I don't know if I'll forget soon or if it'll stay in my mind for the rest of my life. This suspicion usually refers to the latter.

Michael McCann

Evil tv scholar. Proud twitter aficionado. Travel ninja. Hipster-friendly zombie fanatic.

Entertainment

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Navigate

  • Home
  • Top News
  • World
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Tech
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Contact Form

Pages

  • About Us
  • DMCA
  • Contact Form
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy

Pages

  • About Us
  • Contact Form
  • DMCA
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy

STAY UPTODATE

Get the Latest News With Aviationanalysis.net

OFFICE

X. Herald Inc.
114 5th Ave New York,
NY 10011, United States

QUERIES?

Do you have any queries? Feel free to contact us via our Contact Form

Visit Our Office

X. Herald Inc.
114 5th Ave New York,
NY 10011, United States

©2025 | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes
  • Home
  • Top News
  • World
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Tech
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Contact Form