Close Menu
Aviation Analysis – Industry Travel News
  • About Us
  • DMCA
  • Contact Form
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Aviation Analysis – Industry Travel News
  • Home
  • Top News
  • World
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Tech
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Contact Form
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
Subscribe
  • Home
  • Top News
  • World
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Tech
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Contact Form
Aviation Analysis – Industry Travel News
Home»Tech»Swatch wins the battle of “something else”
Tech

Swatch wins the battle of “something else”

Theodore MeeksBy Theodore MeeksMarch 30, 2021No Comments2 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Swatch wins the battle of “something else”
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

Since the launch of the Apple Watch in 2015, the trolling battle has become between Apple and Swatch. The Swiss watchmaker did everything in its power to prevent the American manufacturer from using the “iWatch” trademark (a few months before the introduction of its connected watch, Apple increased the number of trademark filings for that name). Quarrel Street Courtrooms lasted two years later, this time in reverse with Apple criticizing Swatch for using the logo. Put a different tag Very close to the famous Change the way you think A complaint was filed in 2017.

Today we learned that the Swiss group has won a battle: a court in London has issued the right to raise the slogan. another thing It is, however, the phrase “signature” of Steve Jobs. Tim Cook himself used it to introduce the Apple Watch in September 2014 (read: “something else”: the little phrase that says a lot). Since 2015, Swatch has sought to register this trademark, explaining It wasn’t Apple inspired, but … from Lieutenant Colombo who cornered the culprits with their question. ” one last thing ».

Recording this sentence can be considered an attempt. Bother Apple, but the latter cannot block the deposit, according to Judge Iain Purvis who sided with Swatch’s interpretation of the shrewd bogus police officer. In doing so, this ruling overrides a previous court ruling that Swatch’s intentions crossed the line between appropriate and inappropriate branding use.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Theodore Meeks

Lifelong foodaholic. Professional twitter expert. Organizer. Award-winning internet geek. Coffee advocate.

Related Posts

Battery miracle in test – HP Omnibook X AI: If it takes longer again

August 29, 2024

Star Wars Outlaws in Standard Technology Test

August 29, 2024

The startup allows the sun to be “requested” from space using a mirror.

August 29, 2024
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Navigate
  • Home
  • Top News
  • World
  • Economy
  • Science
  • Tech
  • Sport
  • Entertainment
  • Contact Form
Pages
  • About Us
  • DMCA
  • Contact Form
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
Pages
  • About Us
  • Contact Form
  • DMCA
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy
STAY UPTODATE

Get the Latest News With Aviationanalysis.net

OFFICE

X. Herald Inc.
114 5th Ave New York,
NY 10011, United States

QUERIES?

Do you have any queries? Feel free to contact us via our Contact Form

Visit Our Office

X. Herald Inc.
114 5th Ave New York,
NY 10011, United States

  • About Us
  • DMCA
  • Contact Form
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
© 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.