OpenAI response: Musk wanted 'total control'
ChatGPT's founders say it's sad that Elon Musk, whom they greatly admire, is taking them to court. The billionaire and Tesla boss accuses them of setting the company up to make a profit.
Now Microsoft is cashing in: Elon Musk is upset by the fact that the founders of Open AI did not position the company for profit. They respond: Musk wanted to run everything under Tesla.
Photography: Andreas Solaro (AFP)
ChatGPT developer OpenAI has responded to Elon Musk's lawsuit with its own allegations against the tech billionaire.
Musk sought “total control” of OpenAI and the company's leadership position, the startup's co-founders led by its president, Sam Altman, wrote in a blog post on Tuesday. In 2018, he also called for OpenAI to be integrated with electric car maker Tesla, which he leads. Musk did not initially comment on the statement, which appeared to be based largely on emails at the time.
He was a tech billionaire OpenAI sued last week. The essence of this is that the company that Musk co-founded in 2015 has deviated from the agreed upon path of being a non-profit company whose research in the field of artificial intelligence should benefit humanity. Now major investor Microsoft in particular is benefiting from this – to Musk, this is a “flagrant violation” of the original founding agreement.
OpenAI: Great progress has been made without Musk
The OpenAI founders announced that they want Musk's lawsuit dismissed in court. It was sad that someone they greatly admired was now going to court after they had made so much progress without him. Musk gave OpenAI “zero” chances of success when he left the startup. Instead, he plans to develop artificial intelligence under the Tesla umbrella.
ChatGPT is an AI chatbot that sparked unprecedented buzz around AI a year ago – with predictions of a kind of digital paradise for everyone. With helpful robots It extends to the fear of eliminating humanity. AI-powered chatbots, like ChatGPT, are trained on vast amounts of information and can formulate texts at the linguistic level of a human. The principle behind this is that they estimate, word for word, how a sentence should continue.
Department of Political Affairs/Primary
Did you find an error? Report now.
